U.S. Response to Jihad?

DixieVsEnemies

It should be an important lesson to Southerners the South over to witness the great disparity in treatment that they have received in comparison to the Islamic community of the United States. While Southern symbols were banned by both Federal and State governments (usually by Scallywag Republicans betraying their voters), the symbols of Islam have been allowed to fly freely. While Southern symbols have been banned by mega-corporations, these same corporations see no problem in representing the signs of Islam.

It is the perfect juxtaposition; the South’s St Andrew’s Cross compared with the Islamic world’s ISIS flag. Both are battle-flags, only one has received public outcry.

The tragedy in Tennessee has served to show Southerners the blind hatred that the U.S. government and media have for their identity. This act was not representative of Islam, they maintain, even while Jihadists slay countless persons in Libya, Nigeria, France, and now Tennessee. While the actions of Roof were solely his own, how can the repeated acts of violence from countless Islamists go without condemnation? Why the double standard to Southerners, the lack of civility?

The lesson? The United States government, indeed, most of the Republican Party, cannot be trusted to treat the South in a fair manner. They would rather see Dixians displaced by men like Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez and witness the horror that follows than allow for the South’s interests to represented. After all, radical relativism and radical Islam are both edges to the same evil sword striking against the South.

Just as the acts of ISIS’ destruction of Assyrian monuments is an affront to the ancient Christian minority there, so also should the U.S. attacks on the South be seen as nothing less than our attempted genocide.

Advertisements

Feds Rule Against Marriage

 

 Federals Marching Boldly Forward

Federals Marching Boldly Forward

Our black-robed handlers have now decreed that Sodomite “marriage” is a right that is to be enforced in the states. As LifeSiteNews reports,

In a 5-4 ruling handed down this morning in Obergefell v. Hodges, the justices ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to offer marriage licenses to homosexual couples. That overturns a ruling from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Ohio, which held that the univerally recognized right to marry applies only as marriage has historically been understood: the union of one man and one woman.

Looking at the decay around us, especially at the cultural genocide being inflicted on our people, it comes as no surprise as to the court’s decision. The steps to ensure this egalitarian ecstasy had been laid long before our own time. In fact, one could trace the move (as the article above relates) back to the anti-Southern 14th Amendment, which provided the legal foothold necessary for advancing such a decadent decision. How will the states react? It is clear, just as Roe v. Wade has shown, that the Federal government never backs down from policies they implement- Republican or Democrat making little difference. There are two steps left as recourse. Firstly, the states must nullify these overreaches, and then they must declare independence as a means of safeguarding the Sacred Institutions and the culture at large.

The Federals have waged war on every aspect of Alabamian life, from our Sacraments to our symbols. Now is the time to act; there is no room for complacency.

Pax Christi

St. Andrews News

Alabama Stands

MontgomeryALFlag

In light of the predictable Federal assaults upon the sanctity of marriage via their black-robed lackeys (otherwise known as Federal Judges), some men and women have been shown to have both a backbone and a moral compass, refusing to give in to the despicable demands. This Saturday, the 6th of June, many Alabamians will converge on the capitol for a pro-marriage rally:

Sanctity of Marriage Alabama, a group advocating for the definition of marriage to remain as a union between one man and one woman, is set to gather with state leaders, pastors and other individuals in front of the Alabama Capitol Building for an “Alabama for Marriage Rally” on Saturday, June 6th from 3:00 to 4:00 p.m….The group says they organized the event for Christians to come together and promote marriage between one man and one woman, as well as to encourage state leaders to stand up against judicial overreach.

God-willing, St. Andrews News will be able to make the event and cover it for our readers. We encourage as many persons as possible to attend and show the world that Alabama will stand.

 

Montgomery ‘SECEDE’ Sign Showdown

SECEDEsignshowdown

The League ‘Secede’ billboard in our Capitol has been the centre of a controversy. The sign, erected after the Alabama League of the South’s protest against the SPLC’s war on marriage, was removed after only two days due to “complaints” by individuals. Southern Nationalist Network, the prime Southron media outlet, has been steadily reporting on the events surrounding the ‘SECEDE’ sign. Harold Crews, a Carolinian attorney and head of the NC League of the South, says the move shows that Southerners are now being treated as “second class citizens” in our own homelands.

Lamar Advertising, a Baton Rouge, LA company, is responsible for removing the billboard. They put an identical billboard up for the Florida LoS’s demonstration with no difficulty.

Lamar recently posted an update on Facebook, stating that:

We have received your comments about the recent billboard copy that was taken down in Montgomery. We are investigating the situation and will be in touch when we know more.

Complaints by Southern Nationalists and a petition to restore the billboard seem to be gaining ground, especially as media coverage increases.

Alabama League of the South Rally – Montgomery

MontgomeryALFlag

 

Big happenings in Alabama:

 

The League of the South will protest the SPLC – Southern Poverty Law Center’s lawsuit seeking to overturn Alabama laws that prevent the recognition of same-sex marriages from other States.

When: Friday May 9th 11:00am – 1:00pm

Where: SPLC headquarters 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, AL

From Dr. Michael Hill:

“Marriage is the God-ordained union between a man and woman. It cannot be otherwise and still be called ‘marriage.’ What the State of Alabama is seeking to do is to protect that blessed union from being perverted by something God Himself has called an ‘abomination.’ The SPLC has aligned itself with the forces that seek to overturn God’s institution and destroy the family–the building block of our civilization. The League of the South stands with the State of Alabama and her good citizens who wish to uphold the long-standing Christian traditions of marriage and the family.”

Contact: Dr. Michael Hill
jmichhill@cs.com
League Of The South

 

 

It Is Happening

St.ValentineUS

As predicted, the Federal government has already assaulted the South’s defense of marriage:

A federal judge struck down Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage today, an historic ruling with especial resonance on Valentine’s Day.

  Kentucky was one of the first to be undermined. Now the forces of Yankeedom have stuck a dagger through Virginia’s heart. Rest assured, Alabama’s time is coming.

Somehow we don’t think St. Valentine, beheaded for propagating the Faith, would like what they’re doing one bit.

St. Valentine, Pray for Us!

HB31- Terror of the Totalitarians

Hb31-Scream

HB31 is sending shivers through the spines of anti-Alabamians. The bill, introduced by Rep. Becky Nordgren, would

allow health care providers to decline to perform any health care service that violates their conscience and provide remedies for persons who exercise that right and suffer consequences as a result…

Sounds pretty decent. That would allow physicians who are opposed to killing a child (of fetal stage) in the womb to “opt out.” Choice- isn’t that what most liberals say they like? Everyone gets to choose?

Not according to David Edwards of Raw Story. To him, the bill allows

hospitals to turn away pregnant women who were experiencing a miscarriage

Now does Mr. Edwards really believe that a pro-life doctor would turn a woman away genuinely experiencing miscarriage? What an utter fool. Miscarriage is a sad thing, but Mr. Edwards is merely using it as a scare tactic in opposition to HB31. To him and many others abortion is always the answer. If a women says she has a miscarriage, which is is what Mr. Edwards implies, then by golly that doctor should acquiesce no questions asked. Never mind that in the United Kingdom more than 400 women told that they had a miscarriage did not, in fact, have one. This led many to abort their child. Not only that, but the methods used to determine miscarriage are dangerously inaccurate. Professor Basky Thilaganathan states:

(R)esearch shows that the current guidance on how to use ultrasound scans to detect a miscarriage may lead to a wrong diagnosis in some cases. Health professionals need clearer evidence-based guidance to prevent this happening

The article on Raw Story even alludes that HB31 exclusively deals with two subjects- cloning and miscarriage. “Anti-cloning bill” allows doctors to turn away “miscarrying women.” One would think they didn’t even read the bill. More likely, however, is a purposefully sensationalised title whipped up by trash-hounds to incite people. Journalism at it’s finest.

Not surprisingly, Raw Story calls upon that bastion of ill-will in Alabama, Al.com, to make their case. John Archibald states:

Good to know Alabama Legislators, who don’t seem to care much about feeding or educating people, are ready to protect them against forced cloning

Good deflection there, Johnny. The ad hominem attacks are a nice touch.

How can Mr. Edwards call out Alabamian legislators, many of whom contribute vast sums to charities, for their alleged inhumanity? Unless taxpayer money-under direction of the government-is used and abused, charity must not take place. What a strange mind to reason in such fashion.

Mr. Edwards clearly didn’t even read HB31. It defines health care services as :

 Any phase of patient medical care, treatment or procedure that is limited to abortion, human cloning, human embryonic stem cell research, and sterilization, and is related to: Patient referrals, counseling, therapy, testing, diagnosis or prognosis, research, instruction, prescribing, dispensing or administering any device, drug, or medication, surgery, or any other care or treatment rendered or provided by health care providers.

Cloning is only one of a slew of other issues. Choice is at the heart of the matter. Choice on whether a doctor or nurse would perform an abortion. And, despite Rep. Patricia Todd’s insistence, abortions are being forced upon health care providers.Liberals don’t want choice. They want abortions, welfare, warfare. “Equality,” “inclusiveness” and “choice” are just screens to cover their advances and intentions. If y’all want to know where they’re coming from, just read the comments on the Raw Story article. One “enlightened” individual even said that

this country needs to pass a law that says if you aren’t willing to do the job you were hired to do because of religious reasons you should immediately be fired with no recourse.

That puts everything in perspective.

Mr. Archibald, just like Raw Story, jumped on the bandwagon without any thought whatsoever. 

If you want to find out what a bill says, read it yourself. Certainly don’t take their words for it.